Chicago Housing Reform Could Unlock Affordability
Chicago continues to struggle with a shortage of affordable housing, and many observers argue that traditional public-sector approaches have failed to produce lasting results. Some urban policy experts now believe the solution lies in loosening regulations and allowing the private sector more freedom to meet the city’s growing housing demand.
For decades, Chicago has maintained restrictive zoning laws that limit density and preserve single-family residential areas. Rules mandating large minimum lot sizes, prohibiting boardinghouses, and requiring off-street parking have constrained new construction and driven up costs in neighborhoods with high demand. Reform advocates argue that easing these restrictions would enable a wider range of diverse and flexible housing types to flourish.
One increasingly popular strategy is the promotion of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) — smaller homes built in backyards, attics, or basements. Chicago’s current ADU program is limited to five pilot zones and comes with strict conditions such as owner-occupancy requirements and caps on the number of units. Advocates suggest expanding ADU eligibility citywide, particularly in RS-1 to RS-3 zones, where current rules restrict homeowners from building rental units. These zones vary in their strictness, with RS-1 limited to single-family homes and RS-3 allowing modest multi-unit structures.
Historically, boardinghouses and single-room occupancy (SRO) units played a crucial role in providing affordable housing for low-income residents. However, between 1960 and 1980, more than 80 percent of SRO units disappeared as stricter building and health codes increased operational costs and led to widespread closures. Reformers propose revisiting these regulations by lifting occupancy caps, updating safety codes, and creating zoning categories for co-living models similar to those in cities such as Tokyo and Berlin, where micro-units have been successfully implemented.
Parking requirements have also proven to be a major barrier to affordability. Each mandated parking space can add $25,000 to $50,000 to the cost of development. In 2025, Chicago eliminated parking minimums near transit stations, a move that reduced expenses for builders and encouraged smaller-scale projects. Advocates now urge extending that policy citywide.
Another challenge is the city’s permitting process, which often requires aldermanic approval even when projects meet zoning standards. This layer of political oversight can delay projects and deter small developers. Experts suggest that streamlining approvals for compliant proposals could significantly reduce costs and speed up construction.
Existing zoning codes also mandate minimum dwelling unit sizes and require each unit to have private kitchens and bathrooms. Reformers argue that removing these requirements would allow the creation of smaller, more affordable units better suited for students, service workers, and seniors. However, these proposals face resistance from homeowners in certain neighborhoods, who fear the impact on property values.
Supporters of reform argue that providing homeowners with more flexibility—such as the option to add rental units or build coach houses—could strengthen communities and help families remain together across generations. They acknowledge that change may be controversial, but believe that expanding housing options will ultimately benefit the city as a whole.
At the same time, analysts note that public-sector oversight remains crucial to ensure safety and stability as the city adapts to new forms of development. Chicago’s path forward, they say, will rely on finding the right balance between innovation and regulation to ensure housing that remains affordable, inclusive, and sustainable for every Chicago resident.
